The marketplace in which most commerce takes place today is not a pre-existing condition of the universe. It’s not nature. It’s a game, with very particular rules, set in motion by real people with real purposes. That’s why it’s so amazing to me that scientists, and people calling themselves scientists, would propose to study the market as if it were some natural system — like the weather, or a coral reef. It’s not. It’s a product not of nature but of engineering. And to treat the market as nature, as some product of purely evolutionary forces, is to deny ourselves access to its ongoing redesign. It’s as if we woke up in a world where just one operating system was running on all our computers and, worse, we didn’t realize that any other operating system ever did or could ever exist. We would simply accept Windows as a given circumstance, and look for ways to adjust our society to its needs rather than the other way around.
Douglas Rushkoff (via azspot) (via jhnbrssndn)
  1. onefootinthegrave reblogged this from jhnbrssndn
  2. hunterkgatherer reblogged this from soupsoup
  3. bossa reblogged this from jhnbrssndn
  4. jhnbrssndn reblogged this from azspot
  5. soupsoup reblogged this from azspot
  6. azspot posted this
putting the shady in Shadyside since 2007

timmyboots in your gmail

view archive

Remember there are no stupid questions, only stupid people